Almond stuffed olives vs Oliva peranzana
Overall, Almond stuffed olives has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Almond stuffed olives | Oliva peranzana |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | e |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 277 kcal | 301 kcal |
| Fat | 29 g | 29.6 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.4 g | 4.2 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 3.1 g | 3 g |
| Fiber | 4.7 g | 3.4 g |
| Protein | 3.4 g | 2.4 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Almond stuffed olives has 90% less saturated fat (0.4 g vs 4.2 g).
- Oliva peranzana has no sugar, while Almond stuffed olives has 0.5 g.
- Almond stuffed olives has 28% more fiber (4.7 g vs 3.4 g).
- Almond stuffed olives has 29% more protein (3.4 g vs 2.4 g).
- Almond stuffed olives has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Almond stuffed olives
Not available.
Oliva peranzana
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Almond stuffed olives or Oliva peranzana?
Overall, Almond stuffed olives has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Almond stuffed olives has fewer calories: 277 kcal versus 301 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Oliva peranzana has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.