Campo Verde Olivenpaste aus Kalamata-Oliven vs Oliva peranzana
Overall, Campo Verde Olivenpaste aus Kalamata-Oliven has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Campo Verde Olivenpaste aus... | Oliva peranzana |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | e |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 223 kcal | 301 kcal |
| Fat | 27.7 g | 29.6 g |
| Saturated fat | 3.6 g | 4.2 g |
| Sugars | 0.3 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 1.6 g | 3 g |
| Fiber | 6.6 g | 3.4 g |
| Protein | 1.1 g | 2.4 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Campo Verde Olivenpaste aus Kalamata-Oliven has 26% fewer calories (223 kcal vs 301 kcal).
- Campo Verde Olivenpaste aus Kalamata-Oliven has 14% less saturated fat (3.6 g vs 4.2 g).
- Oliva peranzana has no sugar, while Campo Verde Olivenpaste aus Kalamata-Oliven has 0.3 g.
- Campo Verde Olivenpaste aus Kalamata-Oliven has 47% less salt (1.6 g vs 3 g).
- Campo Verde Olivenpaste aus Kalamata-Oliven has 49% more fiber (6.6 g vs 3.4 g).
- Oliva peranzana has 54% more protein (2.4 g vs 1.1 g).
- Campo Verde Olivenpaste aus Kalamata-Oliven has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Campo Verde Olivenpaste aus Kalamata-Oliven
Kalamata-Oliven (92%), Meersalz, Weinessig, Knoblauch, natives Olivenöl extra, Oregano.
Oliva peranzana
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Campo Verde Olivenpaste aus Kalamata-Oliven or Oliva peranzana?
Overall, Campo Verde Olivenpaste aus Kalamata-Oliven has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Campo Verde Olivenpaste aus Kalamata-Oliven has fewer calories: 223 kcal versus 301 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Oliva peranzana has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.3 g per 100 g.