Paté de aceitunas negras vs Oliva Iliada Kalamata
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Paté de aceitunas negras | Oliva Iliada Kalamata |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 269 kcal | 240 kcal |
| Fat | 26 g | 25 g |
| Saturated fat | 4 g | 3.7 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 4.1 g | 4 g |
| Fiber | 2.7 g | — |
| Protein | 1.6 g | 1.3 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | Celery, Fish, Milk | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Oliva Iliada Kalamata has 11% fewer calories (240 kcal vs 269 kcal).
- Paté de aceitunas negras has 19% more protein (1.6 g vs 1.3 g).
- Only Paté de aceitunas negras lists: Celery, Fish, Milk.
Ingredients
Paté de aceitunas negras
aceitunas negras, aceite de oliva virgen extra sal, corrector de acidez (ácido láctico)
Oliva Iliada Kalamata
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Paté de aceitunas negras or Oliva Iliada Kalamata?
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Oliva Iliada Kalamata has fewer calories: 240 kcal versus 269 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Paté de aceitunas negras has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.