Norwegische Lachs Forelle vs Saumon Bio
Overall, Saumon Bio has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Norwegische Lachs Forelle | Saumon Bio |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | d |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 156 kcal | 195 kcal |
| Fat | 8 g | 11.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.7 g | 2.5 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Salt | 3.3 g | 2.6 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 21 g | 23.4 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Fish |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Norwegische Lachs Forelle has 20% fewer calories (156 kcal vs 195 kcal).
- Norwegische Lachs Forelle has 30% less fat (8 g vs 11.4 g).
- Saumon Bio has 21% less salt (2.6 g vs 3.3 g).
- Saumon Bio has 10% more protein (23.4 g vs 21 g).
- Saumon Bio has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Saumon Bio lists: Fish.
Ingredients
Norwegische Lachs Forelle
Lachsforelle, Speisesalz, Buchenholzrauch.
Saumon Bio
Saumon/Lachs/Salmone(*), (salmo salar), (97%) (*) issu de l'agriculture biologique Attention: Peut contenir des arêtes. Allergène / Poisson
FAQ
Which is healthier: Norwegische Lachs Forelle or Saumon Bio?
Overall, Saumon Bio has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Norwegische Lachs Forelle has fewer calories: 156 kcal versus 195 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Norwegische Lachs Forelle has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.1 g per 100 g.