Comparison
Navajas crudas vs Cigala 17/20
Overall, Cigala 17/20 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Navajas crudas | Cigala 17/20 |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | a |
| NOVA group | — | 1 |
| Calories | 38 kcal | 76 kcal |
| Fat | 0.6 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 1.4 g | 0.9 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 8.1 g | 19 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | Crustaceans, Fish, Molluscs, Sulphur dioxide and sulphites | Crustaceans, Sulphur dioxide and sulphites |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Navajas crudas has 50% fewer calories (38 kcal vs 76 kcal).
- Cigala 17/20 has no fat, while Navajas crudas has 0.6 g.
- Cigala 17/20 has 37% less salt (0.9 g vs 1.4 g).
- Cigala 17/20 has 57% more protein (19 g vs 8.1 g).
- Cigala 17/20 has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Navajas crudas lists: Fish, Molluscs.
Ingredients
Navajas crudas
Navajas Americanas (Ensis Directus)
Cigala 17/20
Cigala (Nephrops novergicus), y antioxidante (metabisulfito sódico).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Navajas crudas or Cigala 17/20?
Overall, Cigala 17/20 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Navajas crudas has fewer calories: 38 kcal versus 76 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Navajas crudas has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.