Necoras cocidas vs Cigala 17/20
Overall, Cigala 17/20 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Necoras cocidas | Cigala 17/20 |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | — | 1 |
| Calories | 85 kcal | 76 kcal |
| Fat | 1.4 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.6 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.8 g | 0.9 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 18 g | 19 g |
| Additives | 1 | 1 |
| Allergens | Crustaceans, Sulphur dioxide and sulphites | Crustaceans, Sulphur dioxide and sulphites |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Cigala 17/20 has 11% fewer calories (76 kcal vs 85 kcal).
- Cigala 17/20 has no fat, while Necoras cocidas has 1.4 g.
- Cigala 17/20 has no saturated fat, while Necoras cocidas has 0.6 g.
Ingredients
Necoras cocidas
Nécora (Necora puber [capturado en Atlantico Noreste: Oeste de Irlanda, Mar de Irlanda, Mar Céltico y Mar de Norte. Puede proceder tambien de Costa noroeste de Escocia e Irlanda del Norte, oeste de Escocia Arte de pesca: nasas, trampas] , antioxidante (metabisulfito sódico)).
Cigala 17/20
Cigala (Nephrops novergicus), y antioxidante (metabisulfito sódico).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Necoras cocidas or Cigala 17/20?
Overall, Cigala 17/20 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Cigala 17/20 has fewer calories: 76 kcal versus 85 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Necoras cocidas has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.