Cigala 17/20 vs Berberechos Al Natural 55/70
Overall, Cigala 17/20 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Cigala 17/20 | Berberechos Al Natural 55/70 |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | c |
| NOVA group | 1 | 3 |
| Calories | 76 kcal | 53 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.9 g | 1.4 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 19 g | 8.4 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | Crustaceans, Sulphur dioxide and sulphites | Molluscs, Marisco |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Berberechos Al Natural 55/70 has 30% fewer calories (53 kcal vs 76 kcal).
- Cigala 17/20 has no fat, while Berberechos Al Natural 55/70 has 0.5 g.
- Cigala 17/20 has 36% less salt (0.9 g vs 1.4 g).
- Cigala 17/20 has 56% more protein (19 g vs 8.4 g).
- Cigala 17/20 has the better Nutri-Score.
- Cigala 17/20 is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Cigala 17/20 lists: Crustaceans, Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.
- Only Berberechos Al Natural 55/70 lists: Molluscs, Marisco.
Ingredients
Cigala 17/20
Cigala (Nephrops novergicus), y antioxidante (metabisulfito sódico).
Berberechos Al Natural 55/70
Berberecho, agua, sal. Puede contener trazas de pescado y crustáceos
FAQ
Which is healthier: Cigala 17/20 or Berberechos Al Natural 55/70?
Overall, Cigala 17/20 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Berberechos Al Natural 55/70 has fewer calories: 53 kcal versus 76 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Cigala 17/20 has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.