Comparison

M&S Milk Chocolate Cookies vs Eit Whela digestive

Overall, M&S Milk Chocolate Cookies has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientM&S Milk Chocolate CookiesEit Whela digestive
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 426 kcal 499 kcal
Fat 21.4 g 23 g
Saturated fat 11.4 g 14 g
Sugars 36.8 g 7.7 g
Salt 0.4 g —
Fiber 0.7 g 4.1 g
Protein 5.9 g 2.6 g
Additives40
AllergensGluten, MilkGluten, Milk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • M&S Milk Chocolate Cookies has 15% fewer calories (426 kcal vs 499 kcal).
  • M&S Milk Chocolate Cookies has 19% less saturated fat (11.4 g vs 14 g).
  • Eit Whela digestive has 79% less sugar (7.7 g vs 36.8 g).
  • Eit Whela digestive has 83% more fiber (4.1 g vs 0.7 g).
  • M&S Milk Chocolate Cookies has 56% more protein (5.9 g vs 2.6 g).

Ingredients

M&S Milk Chocolate Cookies

Sugar · Wheatflour* · Dried Whole Milk · Palm Oil · Cocoa Butter · Soft Brown Sugar · Cocoa Mass · Dried Skimmed Milk · Butter (Milk) · Rapeseed Oil · Black Treacle · Water · Raising Agent: Sodium Bicarbonate · Natural Flavouring · Lecithin · Natural Vanilla Flavouring · Salt.

Eit Whela digestive

wheat flour, sugar, vegetable oils, cocoa mass, cocoa butter, milk powder, whey powder, emulsifier, salt, leavening agents, flavoring

FAQ

Which is healthier: M&S Milk Chocolate Cookies or Eit Whela digestive?

Overall, M&S Milk Chocolate Cookies has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

M&S Milk Chocolate Cookies has fewer calories: 426 kcal versus 499 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Eit Whela digestive has less sugar: 7.7 g versus 36.8 g per 100 g.

More comparisons