Mousse de canard vs Pate de porc integral
Overall, Pate de porc integral has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 9 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Mousse de canard | Pate de porc integral |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 440 kcal | 215 kcal |
| Fat | 44 g | 17 g |
| Saturated fat | 15 g | 5.9 g |
| Sugars | 1.7 g | 1.3 g |
| Salt | 1.5 g | 1.4 g |
| Fiber | 0.8 g | 1.3 g |
| Protein | 8.9 g | 10.8 g |
| Additives | 3 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | Soybeans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pate de porc integral has 51% fewer calories (215 kcal vs 440 kcal).
- Pate de porc integral has 61% less fat (17 g vs 44 g).
- Pate de porc integral has 61% less saturated fat (5.9 g vs 15 g).
- Pate de porc integral has 24% less sugar (1.3 g vs 1.7 g).
- Pate de porc integral has 38% more fiber (1.3 g vs 0.8 g).
- Pate de porc integral has 18% more protein (10.8 g vs 8.9 g).
- Pate de porc integral has the better Nutri-Score.
- Pate de porc integral is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Mousse de canard lists: Milk.
- Only Pate de porc integral lists: Soybeans.
Ingredients
Mousse de canard
Canard 62 % (graisse et foie de canard), foie de volaille. CREME fraîche, LAIT aromatisé (LAIT, poireau, oignon, carotte, thym, laurier), porto rouge, sel, acidifiant : Lactate de sodium, dextrose. Cognac, poivre blanc, curcuma, antioxydants: érythorbate de sodium. Décors glaçage (graisse de canard, saindoux, colorant : Lutéine). Traces de gluten, oeuf, fruits à coques, céleri. % exprimés sur la mousse, hors décors.
Pate de porc integral
ficat de porc (24%), slănină, apă, șorici, proteină vegetală din _soia_, sare iodată, zahăr, amidon din porumb, ceapă, condimente, usturoi
FAQ
Which is healthier: Mousse de canard or Pate de porc integral?
Overall, Pate de porc integral has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pate de porc integral has fewer calories: 215 kcal versus 440 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pate de porc integral has less sugar: 1.3 g versus 1.7 g per 100 g.