Moules Apéritif vs Mexilhões ao Natural
Overall, Mexilhões ao Natural has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Moules Apéritif | Mexilhões ao Natural |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 86 kcal | 105 kcal |
| Fat | 1.9 g | 3 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.5 g | 0.7 g |
| Sugars | 0.8 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 1 g | 0.8 g |
| Fiber | 0.7 g | — |
| Protein | 13.7 g | 17 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | Molluscs, Sulphur dioxide and sulphites | Molluscs |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Moules Apéritif has 18% fewer calories (86 kcal vs 105 kcal).
- Moules Apéritif has 37% less fat (1.9 g vs 3 g).
- Mexilhões ao Natural has no sugar, while Moules Apéritif has 0.8 g.
- Mexilhões ao Natural has 19% more protein (17 g vs 13.7 g).
- Mexilhões ao Natural is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Moules Apéritif lists: Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.
Ingredients
Moules Apéritif
Moules* 52% (Mytilus edulis pêchées en Atlantique Nord-Est), eau, vinaigre 13%, oignons, vin blanc 2.3%, sucre, sel, acidifiant : acide citrique, arômes. * _Mollusques.
Mexilhões ao Natural
Mexilhões (Mytilus chilensis), água e sal.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Moules Apéritif or Mexilhões ao Natural?
Overall, Mexilhões ao Natural has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Moules Apéritif has fewer calories: 86 kcal versus 105 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Mexilhões ao Natural has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.8 g per 100 g.