Moules Apéritif vs Mejillón de Chile cocido
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Moules Apéritif | Mejillón de Chile cocido |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | — |
| NOVA group | 4 | 1 |
| Calories | 86 kcal | 95 kcal |
| Fat | 1.9 g | 2.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.5 g | 0.7 g |
| Sugars | 0.8 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 1 g | 0.9 g |
| Fiber | 0.7 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 13.7 g | 14 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | Molluscs, Sulphur dioxide and sulphites | Molluscs |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Moules Apéritif has 30% less fat (1.9 g vs 2.7 g).
- Mejillón de Chile cocido has no sugar, while Moules Apéritif has 0.8 g.
- Moules Apéritif has 100% more fiber (0.7 g vs 0 g).
- Mejillón de Chile cocido is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Moules Apéritif lists: Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.
Ingredients
Moules Apéritif
Moules* 52% (Mytilus edulis pêchées en Atlantique Nord-Est), eau, vinaigre 13%, oignons, vin blanc 2.3%, sucre, sel, acidifiant : acide citrique, arômes. * _Mollusques.
Mejillón de Chile cocido
mejillones
FAQ
Which is healthier: Moules Apéritif or Mejillón de Chile cocido?
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Moules Apéritif has fewer calories: 86 kcal versus 95 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Mejillón de Chile cocido has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.8 g per 100 g.