Moules Apéritif à la Marinière vs Mejillón de Chile cocido
Overall, Mejillón de Chile cocido has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Moules Apéritif à la Marinière
Mejillón de Chile cocido
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Moules Apéritif à la Mariniè... | Mejillón de Chile cocido |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | — |
| NOVA group | 4 | 1 |
| Calories | 105 kcal | 95 kcal |
| Fat | 2.8 g | 2.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 1 g | 0.7 g |
| Sugars | 0.9 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 1 g | 0.9 g |
| Fiber | 1.9 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 17 g | 14 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | Molluscs | Molluscs |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Mejillón de Chile cocido has 30% less saturated fat (0.7 g vs 1 g).
- Mejillón de Chile cocido has no sugar, while Moules Apéritif à la Marinière has 0.9 g.
- Moules Apéritif à la Marinière has 100% more fiber (1.9 g vs 0 g).
- Moules Apéritif à la Marinière has 18% more protein (17 g vs 14 g).
- Mejillón de Chile cocido is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Moules Apéritif à la Marinière
_moules_ (mytilus edulis) 52% - eau - vinaigre d'alcool - oignons 11% - vin blanc 2,3% - sucre - sel - acidifiant: acide citrique - arômes. - moules (mytilus edulis) pêchées en atlantique nord-est. certaines moules de ce bocal ont pu conserver en partie leur filament d'attache naturel (byssus).
Mejillón de Chile cocido
mejillones
FAQ
Which is healthier: Moules Apéritif à la Marinière or Mejillón de Chile cocido?
Overall, Mejillón de Chile cocido has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Mejillón de Chile cocido has fewer calories: 95 kcal versus 105 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Mejillón de Chile cocido has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.9 g per 100 g.