Comparison
Morcilla de Burgos vs Cecina de Leon
Overall, Cecina de Leon has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Morcilla de Burgos | Cecina de Leon |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | — |
| NOVA group | — | 3 |
| Calories | 229 kcal | 240 kcal |
| Fat | 12.7 g | 7.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 6.1 g | 2.9 g |
| Sugars | 1.6 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 1.1 g | 1.7 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 7 g | 42 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Cecina de Leon has 39% less fat (7.7 g vs 12.7 g).
- Cecina de Leon has 52% less saturated fat (2.9 g vs 6.1 g).
- Cecina de Leon has no sugar, while Morcilla de Burgos has 1.6 g.
- Morcilla de Burgos has 34% less salt (1.1 g vs 1.7 g).
- Cecina de Leon has 83% more protein (42 g vs 7 g).
Ingredients
Morcilla de Burgos
Not available.
Cecina de Leon
Carne de vaca, sal.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Morcilla de Burgos or Cecina de Leon?
Overall, Cecina de Leon has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Morcilla de Burgos has fewer calories: 229 kcal versus 240 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Cecina de Leon has less sugar: 0 g versus 1.6 g per 100 g.