Morcilla de Burgos vs Preparado de carne picada de vacuno
Overall, Preparado de carne picada de vacuno has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Morcilla de Burgos | Preparado de carne picada de... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | c |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 229 kcal | 175 kcal |
| Fat | 12.7 g | 12 g |
| Saturated fat | 6.1 g | 5.7 g |
| Sugars | 1.6 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 1.1 g | 0.4 g |
| Protein | 7 g | 16 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Preparado de carne picada de vacuno has 24% fewer calories (175 kcal vs 229 kcal).
- Preparado de carne picada de vacuno has 69% less sugar (0.5 g vs 1.6 g).
- Preparado de carne picada de vacuno has 64% less salt (0.4 g vs 1.1 g).
- Preparado de carne picada de vacuno has 56% more protein (16 g vs 7 g).
- Preparado de carne picada de vacuno has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Morcilla de Burgos
Not available.
Preparado de carne picada de vacuno
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Morcilla de Burgos or Preparado de carne picada de vacuno?
Overall, Preparado de carne picada de vacuno has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Preparado de carne picada de vacuno has fewer calories: 175 kcal versus 229 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Preparado de carne picada de vacuno has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 1.6 g per 100 g.