Mixed vegetables asian style vs Sauce Soja
Overall, Mixed vegetables asian style has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 4.
Mixed vegetables asian style
Sauce Soja
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Mixed vegetables asian style | Sauce Soja |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | e |
| NOVA group | — | 3 |
| Calories | 63 kcal | 77 kcal |
| Fat | 2.8 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.3 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 4.3 g | 0.6 g |
| Salt | 0.5 g | 16.9 g |
| Fiber | 1.7 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 2.2 g | 10 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Soybeans | Gluten, Soybeans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Mixed vegetables asian style has 18% fewer calories (63 kcal vs 77 kcal).
- Sauce Soja has no fat, while Mixed vegetables asian style has 2.8 g.
- Sauce Soja has no saturated fat, while Mixed vegetables asian style has 0.3 g.
- Sauce Soja has 86% less sugar (0.6 g vs 4.3 g).
- Mixed vegetables asian style has 97% less salt (0.5 g vs 16.9 g).
- Mixed vegetables asian style has 100% more fiber (1.7 g vs 0 g).
- Sauce Soja has 78% more protein (10 g vs 2.2 g).
- Mixed vegetables asian style has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Sauce Soja lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Mixed vegetables asian style
freshona pan-fried ar asian carrots-zucchini - peppers snow peas , mushrooms cooked in soy sauce nutri-score abcde 222 00 10-12 min, ca, 14 min, serving suggestion
Sauce Soja
water, soybeans , wheat , salt
FAQ
Which is healthier: Mixed vegetables asian style or Sauce Soja?
Overall, Mixed vegetables asian style has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Mixed vegetables asian style has fewer calories: 63 kcal versus 77 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Sauce Soja has less sugar: 0.6 g versus 4.3 g per 100 g.