Milo vs Filets de maquereaux
Overall, Milo has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Milo | Filets de maquereaux |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | d |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 181 kcal | 204 kcal |
| Fat | 6.4 g | 12 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.5 g | 6.3 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.5 g | 0.9 g |
| Protein | 30.1 g | 24 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Milo has 11% fewer calories (181 kcal vs 204 kcal).
- Milo has 47% less fat (6.4 g vs 12 g).
- Milo has 76% less saturated fat (1.5 g vs 6.3 g).
- Milo has 44% less salt (0.5 g vs 0.9 g).
- Milo has 20% more protein (30.1 g vs 24 g).
- Milo has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Milo
Not available.
Filets de maquereaux
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Milo or Filets de maquereaux?
Overall, Milo has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Milo has fewer calories: 181 kcal versus 204 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Milo has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.