Filets de maquereaux vs Milo
Overall, Milo has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 8 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Filets de maquereaux | Milo |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | a |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 371 kcal | 181 kcal |
| Fat | 35 g | 6.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 6.9 g | 1.5 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.9 g | 0.5 g |
| Protein | 15 g | 30.1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Milo has 51% fewer calories (181 kcal vs 371 kcal).
- Milo has 82% less fat (6.4 g vs 35 g).
- Milo has 78% less saturated fat (1.5 g vs 6.9 g).
- Milo has no sugar, while Filets de maquereaux has 0.5 g.
- Milo has 44% less salt (0.5 g vs 0.9 g).
- Milo has 50% more protein (30.1 g vs 15 g).
- Milo has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Filets de maquereaux lists: Fish.
Ingredients
Filets de maquereaux
Filets de maquereaux (Scomber scombrus) (78%), huile d'olive vierge extra (20%), se 20% des ingrédients d'origine agricole sont issus de l'agricul biologique. Certifié par Bureau Veritas Certification France FR-BI consommer de préférence avant la date indiquée sur la boîte ouverture,
Milo
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Filets de maquereaux or Milo?
Overall, Milo has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Milo has fewer calories: 181 kcal versus 371 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Milo has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.