Filets de maquereaux muscadet Bio vs Milo
Overall, Milo has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Filets de maquereaux muscade... | Milo |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | a |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 187 kcal | 181 kcal |
| Fat | 14 g | 6.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 3.3 g | 1.5 g |
| Sugars | 0.7 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 10.7 g | 0.5 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 13 g | 30.1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Milo has 54% less fat (6.4 g vs 14 g).
- Milo has 55% less saturated fat (1.5 g vs 3.3 g).
- Milo has no sugar, while Filets de maquereaux muscadet Bio has 0.7 g.
- Milo has 95% less salt (0.5 g vs 10.7 g).
- Milo has 57% more protein (30.1 g vs 13 g).
- Milo has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Filets de maquereaux muscadet Bio lists: Fish.
Ingredients
Filets de maquereaux muscadet Bio
Filets de maquereaux (Scomber scombrus) (70%), marinade au Muscadet (9%) ( vinaigre de vin blanc, vin blanc Muscadet 3,2%, eau, vinaigre d'alcool), carotte (5%), poivron rouge, oignon, vinaigre d'alcool, persil, sel.
Milo
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Filets de maquereaux muscadet Bio or Milo?
Overall, Milo has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Milo has fewer calories: 181 kcal versus 187 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Milo has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.7 g per 100 g.