Filets de maquereau avec peau vs Milo
Overall, Milo has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Filets de maquereau avec pea... | Milo |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 246 kcal | 181 kcal |
| Fat | 20 g | 6.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 4.7 g | 1.5 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.8 g | 0.5 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 17 g | 30.1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Milo has 26% fewer calories (181 kcal vs 246 kcal).
- Milo has 68% less fat (6.4 g vs 20 g).
- Milo has 68% less saturated fat (1.5 g vs 4.7 g).
- Milo has 44% more protein (30.1 g vs 17 g).
- Milo has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Filets de maquereau avec peau lists: Fish.
Ingredients
Filets de maquereau avec peau
Maquereau
Milo
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Filets de maquereau avec peau or Milo?
Overall, Milo has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Milo has fewer calories: 181 kcal versus 246 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Filets de maquereau avec peau has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.