Comparison

Mieszanka studencka vs Cocktail de fruta

Overall, Mieszanka studencka has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientMieszanka studenckaCocktail de fruta
Nutri-Score c e
NOVA group 3 4
Calories 507 kcal 425 kcal
Fat 31.6 g 14 g
Saturated fat 4.6 g 12 g
Sugars 26.8 g 41 g
Salt 0 g 0.3 g
Fiber 10 g 5.2 g
Protein 15.5 g 2.3 g
Additives02
AllergensNuts, PeanutsSulphur dioxide and sulphites

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Cocktail de fruta has 16% fewer calories (425 kcal vs 507 kcal).
  • Cocktail de fruta has 56% less fat (14 g vs 31.6 g).
  • Mieszanka studencka has 62% less saturated fat (4.6 g vs 12 g).
  • Mieszanka studencka has 35% less sugar (26.8 g vs 41 g).
  • Mieszanka studencka has 48% more fiber (10 g vs 5.2 g).
  • Mieszanka studencka has 85% more protein (15.5 g vs 2.3 g).
  • Mieszanka studencka has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Mieszanka studencka is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Mieszanka studencka lists: Nuts, Peanuts.
  • Only Cocktail de fruta lists: Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.

Ingredients

Mieszanka studencka

40% raisins, roasted peanuts, roasted almonds, cashews, sunflower oil

Cocktail de fruta

Uvas pasas, piña deshldratada, papaya deshidratada, coco en láminas, plátano deshidratado, azúcar, aceite de algodón, manteca de coco, conservador (E223 (_sulfitos_)), acidulante (E330), aroma,

FAQ

Which is healthier: Mieszanka studencka or Cocktail de fruta?

Overall, Mieszanka studencka has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Cocktail de fruta has fewer calories: 425 kcal versus 507 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Mieszanka studencka has less sugar: 26.8 g versus 41 g per 100 g.

More comparisons