Matzen vs Original Paratha
Overall, Matzen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 8 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Matzen | Original Paratha |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | d |
| NOVA group | 1 | 3 |
| Calories | 378 kcal | 343 kcal |
| Fat | 1.3 g | 18 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.4 g | 9.1 g |
| Sugars | 1.1 g | 3.8 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.8 g |
| Fiber | 3.7 g | 3.8 g |
| Protein | 11.8 g | 6.1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten, Sesame seeds | Gluten, Soybeans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Matzen has 93% less fat (1.3 g vs 18 g).
- Matzen has 96% less saturated fat (0.4 g vs 9.1 g).
- Matzen has 71% less sugar (1.1 g vs 3.8 g).
- Matzen has 99% less salt (0 g vs 0.8 g).
- Matzen has 48% more protein (11.8 g vs 6.1 g).
- Matzen has the better Nutri-Score.
- Matzen is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Matzen lists: Sesame seeds.
- Only Original Paratha lists: Soybeans.
Ingredients
Matzen
Dinkelmehl (98%), Buchweizenmehl, Wasser. *aus kontrolliert biologischer Landwirt - schaft Kann Spuren von Sesamsamen, Soja und Senfentha lten. Kühl und trocken lagern.
Original Paratha
Wheat Flour, Water, Margarine (Soy - Palm Oil Based), Sugar, Salt, Baking Powder. INGRÉDIENTS: Farine de Blé, Eau, Margarine
FAQ
Which is healthier: Matzen or Original Paratha?
Overall, Matzen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Original Paratha has fewer calories: 343 kcal versus 378 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Matzen has less sugar: 1.1 g versus 3.8 g per 100 g.