Matzen vs Pane azzimo Verso Natura - Conad
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Matzen | Pane azzimo Verso Natura - C... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 378 kcal | 360 kcal |
| Fat | 1.3 g | 0.9 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.4 g | 0.2 g |
| Sugars | 1.1 g | 0.4 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 3.7 g | 3.1 g |
| Protein | 11.8 g | 9.9 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten, Sesame seeds | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pane azzimo Verso Natura - Conad has 31% less fat (0.9 g vs 1.3 g).
- Pane azzimo Verso Natura - Conad has 64% less sugar (0.4 g vs 1.1 g).
- Matzen has 16% more fiber (3.7 g vs 3.1 g).
- Matzen has 16% more protein (11.8 g vs 9.9 g).
- Only Matzen lists: Gluten, Sesame seeds.
Ingredients
Matzen
Dinkelmehl (98%), Buchweizenmehl, Wasser. *aus kontrolliert biologischer Landwirt - schaft Kann Spuren von Sesamsamen, Soja und Senfentha lten. Kühl und trocken lagern.
Pane azzimo Verso Natura - Conad
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Matzen or Pane azzimo Verso Natura - Conad?
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pane azzimo Verso Natura - Conad has fewer calories: 360 kcal versus 378 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pane azzimo Verso Natura - Conad has less sugar: 0.4 g versus 1.1 g per 100 g.