Matjes Herring gillet MSC vs Pilchards de harengs
Overall, Pilchards de harengs has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Matjes Herring gillet MSC | Pilchards de harengs |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | c |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 200 kcal | 164 kcal |
| Fat | 13 g | 12 g |
| Saturated fat | 3.7 g | 3.1 g |
| Sugars | 12 g | 0.9 g |
| Salt | 5.9 g | 0.9 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0.3 g |
| Protein | 10 g | 13 g |
| Additives | 1 | 2 |
| Allergens | Fish | Fish |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pilchards de harengs has 18% fewer calories (164 kcal vs 200 kcal).
- Pilchards de harengs has 16% less saturated fat (3.1 g vs 3.7 g).
- Pilchards de harengs has 93% less sugar (0.9 g vs 12 g).
- Pilchards de harengs has 84% less salt (0.9 g vs 5.9 g).
- Pilchards de harengs has 23% more protein (13 g vs 10 g).
- Pilchards de harengs has the better Nutri-Score.
- Matjes Herring gillet MSC is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Matjes Herring gillet MSC
Harengs en morceaux marinés (60 %), (harengs /Clupea harengus/, sel, sucre, épices), eau, sucre, sel, aneth, vinaigre d'alcool, conservateur (E211), épices.
Pilchards de harengs
harengs 70%, eau, double concentré de tomates 6%, huile de colza 3,1%, sel, vinaigre de vin blanc, vinaigre de vin rouge, amidon modifié de maïs, sucre, oignons, épaississant (gomme xanthane), arôme naturel de poivre
FAQ
Which is healthier: Matjes Herring gillet MSC or Pilchards de harengs?
Overall, Pilchards de harengs has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pilchards de harengs has fewer calories: 164 kcal versus 200 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pilchards de harengs has less sugar: 0.9 g versus 12 g per 100 g.