Matjes Herring gillet MSC vs Hareng
Overall, Hareng has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Matjes Herring gillet MSC | Hareng |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 3 | 1 |
| Calories | 200 kcal | 141 kcal |
| Fat | 13 g | 9.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 3.7 g | 1.7 g |
| Sugars | 12 g | 0.1 g |
| Salt | 5.9 g | 3.7 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 10 g | 14 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish | Fish |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Hareng has 30% fewer calories (141 kcal vs 200 kcal).
- Hareng has 28% less fat (9.3 g vs 13 g).
- Hareng has 54% less saturated fat (1.7 g vs 3.7 g).
- Hareng has 99% less sugar (0.1 g vs 12 g).
- Hareng has 38% less salt (3.7 g vs 5.9 g).
- Hareng has 29% more protein (14 g vs 10 g).
- Hareng is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Matjes Herring gillet MSC
Harengs en morceaux marinés (60 %), (harengs /Clupea harengus/, sel, sucre, épices), eau, sucre, sel, aneth, vinaigre d'alcool, conservateur (E211), épices.
Hareng
Hareng (Clupea harengus), pêché dans l'Atlantique nord-est (zone FAO n° 27) (Mer du Nord, Manche et Mers Celtiques, Mer Baltique) aux chaluts pélagiques ou à la senne.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Matjes Herring gillet MSC or Hareng?
Overall, Hareng has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Hareng has fewer calories: 141 kcal versus 200 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Hareng has less sugar: 0.1 g versus 12 g per 100 g.