Comparison

Hareng vs Pilchards de harengs à la tomate et à l'huile

Overall, Hareng has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 3.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientHarengPilchards de harengs à la to...
Nutri-Score e c
NOVA group 1 4
Calories 141 kcal 195 kcal
Fat 9.3 g 15 g
Saturated fat 1.7 g 3.3 g
Sugars 0.1 g 1.3 g
Salt 3.7 g 1.1 g
Fiber 0 g 0.3 g
Protein 14 g 13 g
Additives02
AllergensFishFish

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Hareng has 28% fewer calories (141 kcal vs 195 kcal).
  • Hareng has 38% less fat (9.3 g vs 15 g).
  • Hareng has 48% less saturated fat (1.7 g vs 3.3 g).
  • Hareng has 92% less sugar (0.1 g vs 1.3 g).
  • Pilchards de harengs à la tomate et à l'huile has 70% less salt (1.1 g vs 3.7 g).
  • Pilchards de harengs à la tomate et à l'huile has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Hareng is less processed (lower NOVA group).

Ingredients

Hareng

Hareng (Clupea harengus), pêché dans l'Atlantique nord-est (zone FAO n° 27) (Mer du Nord, Manche et Mers Celtiques, Mer Baltique) aux chaluts pélagiques ou à la senne.

Pilchards de harengs à la tomate et à l'huile

Harengs (Clupea harengus) 70%, eau, double concentré de tomate 6%, huile de colza 3.1%, sel, vinaigre de vin blanc, vinaigre de vin rouge, amidon transformé de maïs, sucre, oignon en poudre, épaississant : gomme de xanthane, arome naturel de poivre.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Hareng or Pilchards de harengs à la tomate et à l'huile?

Overall, Hareng has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Hareng has fewer calories: 141 kcal versus 195 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Hareng has less sugar: 0.1 g versus 1.3 g per 100 g.

More comparisons