Comparison

Pilchards de harengs à la tomate et à l'huile vs Pilchards

Overall, Pilchards has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientPilchards de harengs à la to...Pilchards
Nutri-Score c c
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 195 kcal 178 kcal
Fat 15 g 13.1 g
Saturated fat 3.3 g 4.4 g
Sugars 1.3 g 1 g
Salt 1.1 g 1 g
Fiber 0.3 g 1 g
Protein 13 g 14.8 g
Additives21
AllergensFishFish

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Pilchards has 13% less fat (13.1 g vs 15 g).
  • Pilchards de harengs à la tomate et à l'huile has 25% less saturated fat (3.3 g vs 4.4 g).
  • Pilchards has 23% less sugar (1 g vs 1.3 g).
  • Pilchards has 73% more fiber (1 g vs 0.3 g).
  • Pilchards has 12% more protein (14.8 g vs 13 g).

Ingredients

Pilchards de harengs à la tomate et à l'huile

Harengs (Clupea harengus) 70%, eau, double concentré de tomate 6%, huile de colza 3.1%, sel, vinaigre de vin blanc, vinaigre de vin rouge, amidon transformé de maïs, sucre, oignon en poudre, épaississant : gomme de xanthane, arome naturel de poivre.

Pilchards

Atlantic Pilchards (65 %) (Fish), Tomato Juice from Concentrate (33 %), Salt, Tapioca Starch, Thickener - Guar Gum.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Pilchards de harengs à la tomate et à l'huile or Pilchards?

Overall, Pilchards has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Pilchards has fewer calories: 178 kcal versus 195 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Pilchards has less sugar: 1 g versus 1.3 g per 100 g.

More comparisons