Hareng vs Pilchards
Overall, Hareng has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 4.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Hareng | Pilchards |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | c |
| NOVA group | 1 | 4 |
| Calories | 141 kcal | 178 kcal |
| Fat | 9.3 g | 13.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.7 g | 4.4 g |
| Sugars | 0.1 g | 1 g |
| Salt | 3.7 g | 1 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 1 g |
| Protein | 14 g | 14.8 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | Fish | Fish |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Hareng has 21% fewer calories (141 kcal vs 178 kcal).
- Hareng has 29% less fat (9.3 g vs 13.1 g).
- Hareng has 61% less saturated fat (1.7 g vs 4.4 g).
- Hareng has 90% less sugar (0.1 g vs 1 g).
- Pilchards has 73% less salt (1 g vs 3.7 g).
- Pilchards has 100% more fiber (1 g vs 0 g).
- Pilchards has the better Nutri-Score.
- Hareng is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Hareng
Hareng (Clupea harengus), pêché dans l'Atlantique nord-est (zone FAO n° 27) (Mer du Nord, Manche et Mers Celtiques, Mer Baltique) aux chaluts pélagiques ou à la senne.
Pilchards
Atlantic Pilchards (65 %) (Fish), Tomato Juice from Concentrate (33 %), Salt, Tapioca Starch, Thickener - Guar Gum.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Hareng or Pilchards?
Overall, Hareng has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Hareng has fewer calories: 141 kcal versus 178 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Hareng has less sugar: 0.1 g versus 1 g per 100 g.