Matcha vs Caro
Overall, Matcha has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Matcha | Caro |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 333 kcal | 371 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | — | 0.2 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 3.2 g |
| Salt | 0.4 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | 16.7 g | 8 g |
| Protein | 16.7 g | 5.1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Matcha has 10% fewer calories (333 kcal vs 371 kcal).
- Matcha has no fat, while Caro has 0.5 g.
- Matcha has no sugar, while Caro has 3.2 g.
- Matcha has 52% more fiber (16.7 g vs 8 g).
- Matcha has 69% more protein (16.7 g vs 5.1 g).
Ingredients
Matcha
Organic Mushroom Blend (Chaga, Reishi, Lion's Mane and Cordyceps mushrooms and mycelium cultured on organic oats and/or organic sorghum), Organic Matcha, Organic Cinnamon, Organic Turmeric, Organic Ginger, Organic Black Pepper, Organic Cardamom, Himalayan Pink Salt
Caro
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Matcha or Caro?
Overall, Matcha has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Matcha has fewer calories: 333 kcal versus 371 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Matcha has less sugar: 0 g versus 3.2 g per 100 g.