Comparison
Nescafé Clásico vs Caro
Overall, Nescafé Clásico has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Nescafé Clásico | Caro |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 400 kcal | 371 kcal |
| Fat | — | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | — | 0.2 g |
| Sugars | 2.5 g | 3.2 g |
| Salt | 0.3 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | 33 g | 8 g |
| Protein | 7 g | 5.1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Nescafé Clásico has 22% less sugar (2.5 g vs 3.2 g).
- Nescafé Clásico has 76% more fiber (33 g vs 8 g).
- Nescafé Clásico has 27% more protein (7 g vs 5.1 g).
Ingredients
Nescafé Clásico
INSTANT COFFEE/CAFE SOLUBIE, 100% PURE COFFEE/CAFE PURO
Caro
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Nescafé Clásico or Caro?
Overall, Nescafé Clásico has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Caro has fewer calories: 371 kcal versus 400 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Nescafé Clásico has less sugar: 2.5 g versus 3.2 g per 100 g.