Comparison
Caro vs Maci
Overall, Caro has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Caro | Maci |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | — |
| NOVA group | — | 3 |
| Calories | 371 kcal | 380 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.2 g | — |
| Sugars | 3.2 g | 65 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 8 g | 6.2 g |
| Protein | 5.1 g | 1.7 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Maci has 80% less fat (0.1 g vs 0.5 g).
- Caro has 95% less sugar (3.2 g vs 65 g).
- Caro has 22% more fiber (8 g vs 6.2 g).
- Caro has 67% more protein (5.1 g vs 1.7 g).
- Only Maci lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Caro
Not available.
Maci
cukor, pörkölt pótkávékivonat (41%; _árpa_, _rozs_, cikóriaaszalvány, cukorrépa)
FAQ
Which is healthier: Caro or Maci?
Overall, Caro has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Caro has fewer calories: 371 kcal versus 380 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Caro has less sugar: 3.2 g versus 65 g per 100 g.