Nescafé Clásico vs Maci
Overall, Nescafé Clásico has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Nescafé Clásico | Maci |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 1 | 3 |
| Calories | 400 kcal | 380 kcal |
| Fat | — | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 2.5 g | 65 g |
| Salt | 0.3 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 33 g | 6.2 g |
| Protein | 7 g | 1.7 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Nescafé Clásico has 96% less sugar (2.5 g vs 65 g).
- Nescafé Clásico has 81% more fiber (33 g vs 6.2 g).
- Nescafé Clásico has 76% more protein (7 g vs 1.7 g).
- Nescafé Clásico is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Maci lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Nescafé Clásico
INSTANT COFFEE/CAFE SOLUBIE, 100% PURE COFFEE/CAFE PURO
Maci
cukor, pörkölt pótkávékivonat (41%; _árpa_, _rozs_, cikóriaaszalvány, cukorrépa)
FAQ
Which is healthier: Nescafé Clásico or Maci?
Overall, Nescafé Clásico has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Maci has fewer calories: 380 kcal versus 400 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Nescafé Clásico has less sugar: 2.5 g versus 65 g per 100 g.