Nescafé Clásico vs Matcha
Overall, Matcha has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Nescafé Clásico | Matcha |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | 3 |
| Calories | 400 kcal | 333 kcal |
| Fat | — | 0 g |
| Sugars | 2.5 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.3 g | 0.4 g |
| Fiber | 33 g | 16.7 g |
| Protein | 7 g | 16.7 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Matcha has 17% fewer calories (333 kcal vs 400 kcal).
- Matcha has no sugar, while Nescafé Clásico has 2.5 g.
- Nescafé Clásico has 49% more fiber (33 g vs 16.7 g).
- Matcha has 58% more protein (16.7 g vs 7 g).
- Nescafé Clásico is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Nescafé Clásico
INSTANT COFFEE/CAFE SOLUBIE, 100% PURE COFFEE/CAFE PURO
Matcha
Organic Mushroom Blend (Chaga, Reishi, Lion's Mane and Cordyceps mushrooms and mycelium cultured on organic oats and/or organic sorghum), Organic Matcha, Organic Cinnamon, Organic Turmeric, Organic Ginger, Organic Black Pepper, Organic Cardamom, Himalayan Pink Salt
FAQ
Which is healthier: Nescafé Clásico or Matcha?
Overall, Matcha has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Matcha has fewer calories: 333 kcal versus 400 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Matcha has less sugar: 0 g versus 2.5 g per 100 g.