Comparison

Mangues en tranches sans peau vs Abricots en oreillons

Overall, Abricots en oreillons has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

Nutrient	Mangues en tranches sans pea...	Abricots en oreillons
Nutri-Score	a	a
NOVA group	1	1
Calories	64 kcal	43 kcal
Fat	0.5 g	0.5 g
Saturated fat	0.1 g	0.1 g
Sugars	10 g	6.4 g
Salt	0 g	0 g
Fiber	1.3 g	1.8 g
Protein	0.7 g	0.6 g
Additives	0	1
Allergens	None listed	None listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

Abricots en oreillons has 33% fewer calories (43 kcal vs 64 kcal).
Abricots en oreillons has 36% less sugar (6.4 g vs 10 g).
Abricots en oreillons has 28% more fiber (1.8 g vs 1.3 g).

Ingredients

Mangues en tranches sans peau

Mangues en tranches (Philippines)

Abricots en oreillons

Abricot, acide ascorbique, acide citrique

FAQ

Which is healthier: Mangues en tranches sans peau or Abricots en oreillons?

Overall, Abricots en oreillons has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Abricots en oreillons has fewer calories: 43 kcal versus 64 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Abricots en oreillons has less sugar: 6.4 g versus 10 g per 100 g.

More comparisons

Mangues en tranches sans... vs Salades de fruits rouges... Salades de fruits rouges... vs Abricots en oreillons Mangues en tranches sans... vs Figues En Quartiers, Imp... Mangues en tranches sans... vs Cerises noires dénoyauté... Mangues en tranches sans... vs Four berry medley Mangues en tranches sans... vs Mirabelles de Lorraine e... Mangues en tranches sans... vs Mango gewürfelt Figues En Quartiers, Imp... vs Abricots en oreillons