Mangues en tranches sans peau vs Mirabelles de Lorraine en oreillons
Overall, Mangues en tranches sans peau has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Mangues en tranches sans peau
Mirabelles de Lorraine en oreillons
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Mangues en tranches sans pea... | Mirabelles de Lorraine en or... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 64 kcal | 81 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 10 g | 16 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 1.3 g | 2.4 g |
| Protein | 0.7 g | 0.7 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Mangues en tranches sans peau has 21% fewer calories (64 kcal vs 81 kcal).
- Mangues en tranches sans peau has 38% less sugar (10 g vs 16 g).
- Mirabelles de Lorraine en oreillons has 46% more fiber (2.4 g vs 1.3 g).
Ingredients
Mangues en tranches sans peau
Mangues en tranches (Philippines)
Mirabelles de Lorraine en oreillons
Mirabelle
FAQ
Which is healthier: Mangues en tranches sans peau or Mirabelles de Lorraine en oreillons?
Overall, Mangues en tranches sans peau has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Mangues en tranches sans peau has fewer calories: 64 kcal versus 81 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Mangues en tranches sans peau has less sugar: 10 g versus 16 g per 100 g.