Comparison

Mangues en tranches sans peau vs Salades de fruits rouges et pêches blanches

Overall, Salades de fruits rouges et pêches blanches has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientMangues en tranches sans pea...Salades de fruits rouges et...
Nutri-Score a b
NOVA group 1 —
Calories 64 kcal 39 kcal
Fat 0.5 g 0.5 g
Saturated fat 0.1 g 0.1 g
Sugars 10 g 6.2 g
Salt 0 g 0 g
Fiber 1.3 g 1.8 g
Protein 0.7 g 0.6 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Salades de fruits rouges et pêches blanches has 39% fewer calories (39 kcal vs 64 kcal).
  • Salades de fruits rouges et pêches blanches has 38% less sugar (6.2 g vs 10 g).
  • Salades de fruits rouges et pêches blanches has 28% more fiber (1.8 g vs 1.3 g).
  • Mangues en tranches sans peau has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Mangues en tranches sans peau

Mangues en tranches (Philippines)

Salades de fruits rouges et pêches blanches

Mélange 94,5% de pêche blanche, fraise, blueberry et sauce 5,5% à base d'hibiscus et de menthe, surgelé. NL Mengeling 94,5% van witte perzik, aardbei, blueberry en saus 5,5% op basis van hibiscus en munt, diepvries. EN Mix 94.5% of white peach, strawberry, blueberry and hibiscus-based and mint sauce 5.5%, quick-frozen.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Mangues en tranches sans peau or Salades de fruits rouges et pêches blanches?

Overall, Salades de fruits rouges et pêches blanches has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Salades de fruits rouges et pêches blanches has fewer calories: 39 kcal versus 64 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Salades de fruits rouges et pêches blanches has less sugar: 6.2 g versus 10 g per 100 g.

More comparisons