Comparison

Salades de fruits rouges et pêches blanches vs Abricots en oreillons

Overall, Abricots en oreillons has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientSalades de fruits rouges et...Abricots en oreillons
Nutri-Score b a
NOVA group — 1
Calories 39 kcal 43 kcal
Fat 0.5 g 0.5 g
Saturated fat 0.1 g 0.1 g
Sugars 6.2 g 6.4 g
Salt 0 g 0 g
Fiber 1.8 g 1.8 g
Protein 0.6 g 0.6 g
Additives01
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Ingredients

Salades de fruits rouges et pêches blanches

Mélange 94,5% de pêche blanche, fraise, blueberry et sauce 5,5% à base d'hibiscus et de menthe, surgelé. NL Mengeling 94,5% van witte perzik, aardbei, blueberry en saus 5,5% op basis van hibiscus en munt, diepvries. EN Mix 94.5% of white peach, strawberry, blueberry and hibiscus-based and mint sauce 5.5%, quick-frozen.

Abricots en oreillons

Abricot, acide ascorbique, acide citrique

FAQ

Which is healthier: Salades de fruits rouges et pêches blanches or Abricots en oreillons?

Overall, Abricots en oreillons has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Salades de fruits rouges et pêches blanches has fewer calories: 39 kcal versus 43 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Salades de fruits rouges et pêches blanches has less sugar: 6.2 g versus 6.4 g per 100 g.

More comparisons