Mandorle perlate vs Mandorle pelate
Overall, Mandorle pelate has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Mandorle perlate | Mandorle pelate |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 616 kcal | 607 kcal |
| Fat | 53 g | 52 g |
| Saturated fat | 3.8 g | 5.1 g |
| Sugars | 4.6 g | 2.2 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 10 g | 11 g |
| Protein | 21 g | 26 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Mandorle perlate has 25% less saturated fat (3.8 g vs 5.1 g).
- Mandorle pelate has 52% less sugar (2.2 g vs 4.6 g).
- Mandorle pelate has 19% more protein (26 g vs 21 g).
Ingredients
Mandorle perlate
Not available.
Mandorle pelate
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Mandorle perlate or Mandorle pelate?
Overall, Mandorle pelate has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Mandorle pelate has fewer calories: 607 kcal versus 616 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Mandorle pelate has less sugar: 2.2 g versus 4.6 g per 100 g.