Comparison
Mandeln gehackt vs Mandorle pelate
Overall, Mandorle pelate has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Mandeln gehackt | Mandorle pelate |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 632 kcal | 607 kcal |
| Fat | 55 g | 52 g |
| Saturated fat | 4.5 g | 5.1 g |
| Sugars | 4 g | 2.2 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 8 g | 11 g |
| Protein | 26 g | 26 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Nuts | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Mandeln gehackt has 12% less saturated fat (4.5 g vs 5.1 g).
- Mandorle pelate has 45% less sugar (2.2 g vs 4 g).
- Mandorle pelate has 27% more fiber (11 g vs 8 g).
- Only Mandeln gehackt lists: Nuts.
Ingredients
Mandeln gehackt
Mandeln
Mandorle pelate
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Mandeln gehackt or Mandorle pelate?
Overall, Mandorle pelate has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Mandorle pelate has fewer calories: 607 kcal versus 632 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Mandorle pelate has less sugar: 2.2 g versus 4 g per 100 g.
More comparisons
Mandorle pelate vs Almendra Marcona
Dry Toasted Slivered Alm... vs Mandorle pelate
Mandorle perlate vs Mandorle pelate
Amandes allumettes vs Mandorle pelate
Mandorle Affettate vs Mandorle pelate
Mandorle sgusciate palat... vs Mandorle pelate
Mandeln gehackt vs Almendra Marcona
Dry Toasted Slivered Alm... vs Mandeln gehackt