Mandorle pelate vs Almendra Marcona
Overall, Mandorle pelate has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Mandorle pelate | Almendra Marcona |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | — | 1 |
| Calories | 607 kcal | 642 kcal |
| Fat | 52 g | 55.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 5.1 g | 6.7 g |
| Sugars | 2.2 g | 3 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.3 g |
| Fiber | 11 g | 9.9 g |
| Protein | 26 g | 26.4 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Nuts |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Mandorle pelate has 24% less saturated fat (5.1 g vs 6.7 g).
- Mandorle pelate has 27% less sugar (2.2 g vs 3 g).
- Only Almendra Marcona lists: Nuts.
Ingredients
Mandorle pelate
Not available.
Almendra Marcona
almendra
FAQ
Which is healthier: Mandorle pelate or Almendra Marcona?
Overall, Mandorle pelate has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Mandorle pelate has fewer calories: 607 kcal versus 642 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Mandorle pelate has less sugar: 2.2 g versus 3 g per 100 g.