Comparison
Malthouse Bread Flour vs Machica
Overall, Machica has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Malthouse Bread Flour | Machica |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | — |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 346 kcal | 367 kcal |
| Fat | 1.4 g | 1.6 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.3 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 1.4 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0 g | — |
| Fiber | 7.4 g | — |
| Protein | 12 g | 10 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Machica has no saturated fat, while Malthouse Bread Flour has 0.3 g.
- Machica has no sugar, while Malthouse Bread Flour has 1.4 g.
- Malthouse Bread Flour has 17% more protein (12 g vs 10 g).
- Only Malthouse Bread Flour lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Malthouse Bread Flour
Wheat, malted wheat flakes 15%, barley malt flour 3%, antioxidant (ascorbic acid).
Machica
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Malthouse Bread Flour or Machica?
Overall, Machica has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Malthouse Bread Flour has fewer calories: 346 kcal versus 367 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Machica has less sugar: 0 g versus 1.4 g per 100 g.