Comparison
Machica vs Barley flour
Overall, Machica has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Machica | Barley flour |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | a |
| NOVA group | — | 1 |
| Calories | 367 kcal | 336 kcal |
| Fat | 1.6 g | 2.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.4 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.8 g |
| Salt | — | 0 g |
| Fiber | — | 8.9 g |
| Protein | 10 g | 9.9 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Machica has 30% less fat (1.6 g vs 2.3 g).
- Machica has no saturated fat, while Barley flour has 0.4 g.
- Machica has no sugar, while Barley flour has 0.8 g.
- Only Barley flour lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Machica
Not available.
Barley flour
Barley flour
FAQ
Which is healthier: Machica or Barley flour?
Overall, Machica has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Barley flour has fewer calories: 336 kcal versus 367 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Machica has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.8 g per 100 g.