Comparison

Mackrel Fillets in spicy tomato sauce vs Milo

Overall, Milo has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientMackrel Fillets in spicy tom...Milo
Nutri-Score c a
NOVA group 3 —
Calories 165 kcal 181 kcal
Fat 9.2 g 6.4 g
Saturated fat 2.3 g 1.5 g
Sugars 5.1 g 0 g
Salt 0.9 g 0.5 g
Fiber 0 g —
Protein 13.3 g 30.1 g
Additives00
AllergensFishNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Milo has 30% less fat (6.4 g vs 9.2 g).
  • Milo has 35% less saturated fat (1.5 g vs 2.3 g).
  • Milo has no sugar, while Mackrel Fillets in spicy tomato sauce has 5.1 g.
  • Milo has 41% less salt (0.5 g vs 0.9 g).
  • Milo has 56% more protein (30.1 g vs 13.3 g).
  • Milo has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Mackrel Fillets in spicy tomato sauce lists: Fish.

Ingredients

Mackrel Fillets in spicy tomato sauce

64% Mackerel Fillets (Fish), Water, 12% Tomato Purée, Sugar, Spirit Vinegar, Spices (Chilli, Star Anise, Nutmeg, Cinnamon, Paprika, Coriander, Fenugreek, Cumin, Turmeric, Garlic, Pepper, Fennel, Clove, Caraway, Ginger, Allspice), Bitter Orange Peel, Salt.

Milo

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Mackrel Fillets in spicy tomato sauce or Milo?

Overall, Milo has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Mackrel Fillets in spicy tomato sauce has fewer calories: 165 kcal versus 181 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Milo has less sugar: 0 g versus 5.1 g per 100 g.

More comparisons