Comparison

Luk vs Cheese&onion gruffalo claws

Overall, Luk has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientLukCheese&onion gruffalo claws
Nutri-Score a c
NOVA group 1 3
Calories 39 kcal 437 kcal
Fat 0.6 g 14 g
Saturated fat 0.2 g 2.1 g
Sugars 4.8 g 2.9 g
Salt 0.1 g 0.1 g
Fiber 1.7 g —
Protein 1.1 g 9.8 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedMilk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Luk has 91% fewer calories (39 kcal vs 437 kcal).
  • Luk has 96% less fat (0.6 g vs 14 g).
  • Luk has 90% less saturated fat (0.2 g vs 2.1 g).
  • Cheese&onion gruffalo claws has 40% less sugar (2.9 g vs 4.8 g).
  • Cheese&onion gruffalo claws has 89% more protein (9.8 g vs 1.1 g).
  • Luk has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Luk is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Cheese&onion gruffalo claws lists: Milk.

Ingredients

Luk

luk

Cheese&onion gruffalo claws

Corn - Sunflower oil Cheese powder (milk) [mature cheddar cheese (milk) 50%, 80.0% 10.0% 8.0% skimmed milk powder 50%] Onion powder (contains rice flour) 2.0% Thiamin (vitamin B1)* <0.1% TOTAL 100% *Thiamin (vitamin B1) has no organic certification. ALLERGY ADVICE: For allergens, see ingredients highlighted in bold. Gluten free.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Luk or Cheese&onion gruffalo claws?

Overall, Luk has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Luk has fewer calories: 39 kcal versus 437 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Cheese&onion gruffalo claws has less sugar: 2.9 g versus 4.8 g per 100 g.

More comparisons