Luk vs Cebolla ultracongelanda
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Luk | Cebolla ultracongelanda |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 39 kcal | 42 kcal |
| Fat | 0.6 g | 0.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.2 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 4.8 g | 5.6 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 1.7 g | 1.8 g |
| Protein | 1.1 g | 1.2 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Cebolla ultracongelanda has 68% less fat (0.2 g vs 0.6 g).
- Luk has 14% less sugar (4.8 g vs 5.6 g).
Ingredients
Luk
luk
Cebolla ultracongelanda
cebolla
FAQ
Which is healthier: Luk or Cebolla ultracongelanda?
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Luk has fewer calories: 39 kcal versus 42 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Luk has less sugar: 4.8 g versus 5.6 g per 100 g.