Comparison

Lasanha de Vegetais vs Spinatlasagne

Overall, Lasanha de Vegetais has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientLasanha de VegetaisSpinatlasagne
Nutri-Score c c
NOVA group 4 3
Calories 115 kcal 122 kcal
Fat 5.6 g 6.5 g
Saturated fat 0.9 g 2.3 g
Sugars 2.1 g 3.3 g
Salt 0.7 g 0.9 g
Fiber 1.6 g 1.7 g
Protein 3.5 g 5.5 g
Additives20
AllergensEggs, Gluten, MilkCelery, Eggs, Gluten, Milk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Lasanha de Vegetais has 14% less fat (5.6 g vs 6.5 g).
  • Lasanha de Vegetais has 61% less saturated fat (0.9 g vs 2.3 g).
  • Lasanha de Vegetais has 35% less sugar (2.1 g vs 3.3 g).
  • Spinatlasagne has 36% more protein (5.5 g vs 3.5 g).
  • Spinatlasagne is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Spinatlasagne lists: Celery.

Ingredients

Lasanha de Vegetais

Água, beringela 12,1% (óleo de girassol), sêmola de trigo duro, curgete 10,2%, tomate 8,7%, cebola 4,7%, concentrado de tomate 3,9%, pimentão verde 3%, queijo Emmental 3%, óleo de colza, farinha de trigo, leite em pó desnatado, amido modificado, sal refinado, ervas 0,4%, ovo em pó, espessantes (goma xantana, goma de alfarroba), açúcar, especiarias.

Spinatlasagne

Wasser, Spinat 25,3%, Magermilch, Hartweizengrieß, Käse, Ei, Weizenmehl, Sonnenblumenöl, Obers, Speisesalz jodiert (Salz, Kaliumjodid), Weizenstärke, Oregano, Knoblauch, Pfeffer, Sellerie, Muskatnuss.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Lasanha de Vegetais or Spinatlasagne?

Overall, Lasanha de Vegetais has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Lasanha de Vegetais has fewer calories: 115 kcal versus 122 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Lasanha de Vegetais has less sugar: 2.1 g versus 3.3 g per 100 g.

More comparisons