Lasagne bolognese végétarienne vs Lasanha de Vegetais
Overall, Lasagne bolognese végétarienne has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Lasagne bolognese végétarien... | Lasanha de Vegetais |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | c |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 120 kcal | 115 kcal |
| Fat | 4 g | 5.6 g |
| Saturated fat | 1 g | 0.9 g |
| Sugars | 3.2 g | 2.1 g |
| Salt | 0.5 g | 0.7 g |
| Fiber | 1.1 g | 1.6 g |
| Protein | 5.4 g | 3.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 2 |
| Allergens | None listed | Eggs, Gluten, Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Lasagne bolognese végétarienne has 29% less fat (4 g vs 5.6 g).
- Lasanha de Vegetais has 34% less sugar (2.1 g vs 3.2 g).
- Lasanha de Vegetais has 31% more fiber (1.6 g vs 1.1 g).
- Lasagne bolognese végétarienne has 35% more protein (5.4 g vs 3.5 g).
- Lasagne bolognese végétarienne has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Lasanha de Vegetais lists: Eggs, Gluten, Milk.
Ingredients
Lasagne bolognese végétarienne
Not available.
Lasanha de Vegetais
Água, beringela 12,1% (óleo de girassol), sêmola de trigo duro, curgete 10,2%, tomate 8,7%, cebola 4,7%, concentrado de tomate 3,9%, pimentão verde 3%, queijo Emmental 3%, óleo de colza, farinha de trigo, leite em pó desnatado, amido modificado, sal refinado, ervas 0,4%, ovo em pó, espessantes (goma xantana, goma de alfarroba), açúcar, especiarias.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Lasagne bolognese végétarienne or Lasanha de Vegetais?
Overall, Lasagne bolognese végétarienne has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Lasanha de Vegetais has fewer calories: 115 kcal versus 120 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Lasanha de Vegetais has less sugar: 2.1 g versus 3.2 g per 100 g.