Comparison
Labneh turkia vs Pinar labneh 200g
Overall, Pinar labneh 200g has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Labneh turkia | Pinar labneh 200g |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | c |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 186 kcal | 210 kcal |
| Fat | 17 g | 18 g |
| Saturated fat | 14 g | 9 g |
| Sugars | 3 g | 2 g |
| Salt | 0.6 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 4.1 g | 5.6 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Labneh turkia has 11% fewer calories (186 kcal vs 210 kcal).
- Pinar labneh 200g has 36% less saturated fat (9 g vs 14 g).
- Pinar labneh 200g has 33% less sugar (2 g vs 3 g).
- Pinar labneh 200g has no salt, while Labneh turkia has 0.6 g.
- Pinar labneh 200g has 27% more protein (5.6 g vs 4.1 g).
- Pinar labneh 200g has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Labneh turkia
Not available.
Pinar labneh 200g
ingmdicnts: produccd in nutfitioaal (1 8so
FAQ
Which is healthier: Labneh turkia or Pinar labneh 200g?
Overall, Pinar labneh 200g has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Labneh turkia has fewer calories: 186 kcal versus 210 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pinar labneh 200g has less sugar: 2 g versus 3 g per 100 g.