Comparison

La Vie Jambon Végétal vs Smoky Ham Free Slices

Overall, Smoky Ham Free Slices has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientLa Vie Jambon VégétalSmoky Ham Free Slices
Nutri-Score b a
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 115 kcal 101 kcal
Fat 2.1 g 2.5 g
Saturated fat 0.8 g 0.6 g
Sugars 0.7 g 0.3 g
Salt 1.7 g 1.7 g
Fiber 2.8 g 8.5 g
Protein 19 g 13.5 g
Additives23
AllergensSoybeansMycoprotein

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Smoky Ham Free Slices has 12% fewer calories (101 kcal vs 115 kcal).
  • La Vie Jambon Végétal has 16% less fat (2.1 g vs 2.5 g).
  • Smoky Ham Free Slices has 57% less sugar (0.3 g vs 0.7 g).
  • Smoky Ham Free Slices has 67% more fiber (8.5 g vs 2.8 g).
  • La Vie Jambon Végétal has 29% more protein (19 g vs 13.5 g).
  • Smoky Ham Free Slices has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only La Vie Jambon Végétal lists: Soybeans.
  • Only Smoky Ham Free Slices lists: Mycoprotein.

Ingredients

La Vie Jambon Végétal

Protéines de pois réhydratées 48%, Protéines de soja réhydratés, Arôme naturel, Jus concentré de radis, Sel, Correcteur d'acidité : acétates de potassium, Conservateur: acide lactique vegan

Smoky Ham Free Slices

Mycoprotein (78%), Water, Flavourings (contain Smoke Flavourings, Colour (Iron Oxide)), Gelling Agents (Agar, Locust Bean Gum), Potato Protein, Salt, Pea Fibre, Preservative (Potassium Sorbate).

FAQ

Which is healthier: La Vie Jambon Végétal or Smoky Ham Free Slices?

Overall, Smoky Ham Free Slices has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Smoky Ham Free Slices has fewer calories: 101 kcal versus 115 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Smoky Ham Free Slices has less sugar: 0.3 g versus 0.7 g per 100 g.

More comparisons