Krounchy chataigne vs Muesli Fruit
Overall, Muesli Fruit has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Krounchy chataigne | Muesli Fruit |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 466 kcal | 372 kcal |
| Fat | 18 g | 4.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.9 g | 0.9 g |
| Sugars | 21 g | 17 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.3 g |
| Fiber | 6.5 g | 5.2 g |
| Protein | 8.9 g | 9.9 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | Nuts | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Muesli Fruit has 20% fewer calories (372 kcal vs 466 kcal).
- Muesli Fruit has 74% less fat (4.7 g vs 18 g).
- Muesli Fruit has 53% less saturated fat (0.9 g vs 1.9 g).
- Muesli Fruit has 19% less sugar (17 g vs 21 g).
- Krounchy chataigne has 20% more fiber (6.5 g vs 5.2 g).
- Muesli Fruit has 10% more protein (9.9 g vs 8.9 g).
- Krounchy chataigne is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Krounchy chataigne lists: Nuts.
Ingredients
Krounchy chataigne
Flocons d'avoine complets sans gluten 52%, sucre de canne, farine de châtaigne 11%, huile de tournesol, billettes de riz (riz, sel), noisettes toastées 5,7%, sirop de riz, cacao maigre, vanille
Muesli Fruit
Haferflocken glutenfrei (Deutschland, Dänemark, Polen), Trockenfrüchte 26% (Sultaninen [Sultaninen [Türkei], Sonnenblumenöl], Aprikosen [Türkei], Feigen [Türkei]), Cornflakes (Mais, Kochsalz, Emulgator [E 322 aus Soja]), Erdbeeren gefriergetrocknet.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Krounchy chataigne or Muesli Fruit?
Overall, Muesli Fruit has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Muesli Fruit has fewer calories: 372 kcal versus 466 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Muesli Fruit has less sugar: 17 g versus 21 g per 100 g.