Krounchy chataigne vs Choco krispies loops
Overall, Choco krispies loops has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Krounchy chataigne | Choco krispies loops |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 466 kcal | 377 kcal |
| Fat | 18 g | 4.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.9 g | 2 g |
| Sugars | 21 g | 21 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | 6.5 g | 8.3 g |
| Protein | 8.9 g | 8.7 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Nuts | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Choco krispies loops has 19% fewer calories (377 kcal vs 466 kcal).
- Choco krispies loops has 76% less fat (4.3 g vs 18 g).
- Choco krispies loops has 22% more fiber (8.3 g vs 6.5 g).
- Only Krounchy chataigne lists: Nuts.
Ingredients
Krounchy chataigne
Flocons d'avoine complets sans gluten 52%, sucre de canne, farine de châtaigne 11%, huile de tournesol, billettes de riz (riz, sel), noisettes toastées 5,7%, sirop de riz, cacao maigre, vanille
Choco krispies loops
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Krounchy chataigne or Choco krispies loops?
Overall, Choco krispies loops has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Choco krispies loops has fewer calories: 377 kcal versus 466 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Krounchy chataigne has less sugar: 21 g versus 21 g per 100 g.